Lesson 15 of 36 · Data insight
Pie charts and shares of a whole
Convert pie-chart shares into amounts and angles, compare two pies with different totals, and take shares of shares without slipping.
About 18 minutes
In this lesson
- Turn a share into an amount with the total, and a share into a sector angle and back.
- Compare two pie charts with different totals by comparing amounts, not only percentages.
- Combine a share of a share, and keep a change in share apart from a change in amount.
The idea
A pie shows parts of one whole
A pie chart splits one total into parts. Each sector's share is a fraction of that total, and the shares add up to 100% (printed labels may add to 99% or 101% after rounding). What a pie shows well is the relative size of the parts at one moment; what it never shows on its own is the size of the whole. For that you need a total from the title, a note, a table or a passage.
Three conversions
Share to amount. . If a budget of €2,400,000 has 25% for materials, materials cost euros.
Share to angle. A full circle is , so a share is a sector of . Learn the friendly ones: 10% is , 25% is , 50% is , and 5% is . Then 15% is .
Angle to share. Divide by 360: a sector of is . Some pies are labelled with angles rather than percentages, so be ready to go both ways.
Comparing two pies
Questions love two pies side by side: this year and ten years ago, or two cities. A sector that is smaller in the second pie can stand for a larger amount, if the second whole is bigger. So:
- To compare shares, compare the percentages directly.
- To compare amounts, multiply each share by its own total first.
Example: food was 20% of a household's €30,000 spending in one year (€6,000) and 18% of €40,000 ten years later (€7,200). Food's share fell by 2 percentage points, yet spending on food rose by . Both statements are true; they answer different questions.
Change in share versus change in amount
A share moving from 45% to 36% has fallen by 9 percentage points, and by of its old value. Neither number says what happened to the amount; that also depends on the change in the total. When a question asks about "the number of" or "spending on", compute amounts. When it asks about "the share" or "the proportion", compare percentages, and read whether it wants points or percent.
A share of a share
Pies are sometimes nested: a sector is split again in a second chart or in the text. "60% of the students are in economics, and 25% of the economics students are international" makes international economics students , that is 15% of all students. Multiply the shares; never add them, and be clear which whole the final answer is a share of.
The "other" sector and rounded labels
Many pies end with a sector labelled "other" that lumps small categories together. It is one sector, not a category you can split: a question asking whether some unnamed group exceeds 3% cannot be answered from a 7% "other" sector. Labels are also often rounded, so the printed shares may add to 99% or 101%. If a question's options are close together, the rounding can matter; work from exact figures in a table or passage whenever one is given, and treat a rounded share as an approximation.
Pies without a calculator
Shares are usually round, so the arithmetic is mostly multiplying a round percent by a round total. Write of as : one percent of 2,500 is 25. For angles, build from and . For comparisons between sectors in the same pie, the totals cancel: the ratio of two amounts is just the ratio of their shares.
Worked examples
Example 1: Amounts and angles from one pie
A pie chart shows how a firm's 2025 costs of €2,400,000 were split: staff 45%, materials 25%, rent 15%, marketing 10%, other 5%. How much did rent cost, what angle does the rent sector have, and how many times larger were staff costs than marketing costs?
Rent amount: . One percent of 2,400,000 is 24,000, and confirms it.
Rent angle: , or from the 10% and 5% benchmarks.
Staff over marketing: within one pie the total cancels, so the ratio is . Check with amounts: .
Answer
Rent cost €360,000, its sector is , and staff costs were 4.5 times marketing costs. Answering "35 times" or "35 points more" mixes up a ratio with a difference of shares; staff is 35 percentage points above marketing, but 4.5 times as large.
Example 2: Smaller slice, bigger amount
Two pie charts show a city's tourist spending. In 2015 the total was €50 million and accommodation was 40%. In 2025 the total was €80 million and accommodation was 30%. Did spending on accommodation rise or fall, and by how much?
The question is about spending, an amount, so multiply each share by its own total.
2015: million euros. 2025: million euros.
Change: million, and as a percent of the old value .
Answer
Spending on accommodation rose by €4 million, or 20%, even though its sector shrank from 40% to 30%. "It fell by 10 points" describes the share, not the spending.
Example 3: A share of a share
A university has 8,000 students. A pie chart shows that 60% study economics. A second chart shows that 25% of the economics students are international. How many international economics students are there, and what share of all students are they?
Multiply the shares: , so international economics students are 15% of all students.
Apply it to the whole: .
Check by steps: economics students , and a quarter of 4,800 is 1,200.
Answer
1,200 students, 15% of the university. Taking 25% of all 8,000 students (2,000) uses the wrong whole: the 25% is of economics students only.
Common traps
Comparing slices across pies with different totals
A smaller percentage of a larger whole can be a larger amount. Before saying "fell" or "rose" about an amount, multiply each share by its own total.
Points versus percent of a share
A share going from 45% to 36% is down 9 percentage points and down 20% of its old value. Options often include both, plus the change in the amount, which can be zero or positive. Read which of the three the question asks for.
The wrong whole for a nested share
"25% of the economics students" is not 25% of all students. When one share is taken of a sector, multiply the shares and state which whole the result belongs to.
Percent read as degrees
A 16% sector is not ; it is . Convert with 360, and sanity-check: a quarter of the pie must be .
Check yourself
Answer each question before you open its answer.
Question 1: What happened to the number of car commuters?
Numerical critical reasoning
Two pie charts show how surveyed commuters in a city travel to work. In 2019, 2,000 commuters were surveyed; in 2024, 2,500.
| Main mode | 2019 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Car | 45% | 36% |
| Bus | 25% | 24% |
| Bicycle | 10% | 16% |
| Train | 15% | 18% |
| Walking | 5% | 6% |
From 2019 to 2024, the number of surveyed commuters who travelled mainly by car:
- A.fell by 20%
- B.fell by 9%
- C.stayed the same
- D.rose by 25%
Show the answer
Answer: C. stayed the same
Working
Car commuters in 2019: . In 2024: . The number is unchanged; the share fell only because the total grew.
Why the other options are wrong
- A. This is the fall in the car share as a percent of its old value, ; it ignores that more people were surveyed.
- B. The share fell by 9 percentage points; that is neither a percent change nor a statement about the number.
- D. 25% is the growth in the number surveyed, from 2,000 to 2,500, not in the number travelling by car.
What carries over
To compare amounts across two pies, multiply each share by its own total first.
Question 2: The angle of a sector
Numerical critical reasoning
Use the commuting pie charts from the previous question.
| Main mode | 2019 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Car | 45% | 36% |
| Bus | 25% | 24% |
| Bicycle | 10% | 16% |
| Train | 15% | 18% |
| Walking | 5% | 6% |
In the 2024 pie chart, what is the angle of the bicycle sector?
- A.
- B.
- C.
- D.
Show the answer
Answer: C.
Working
. By benchmarks: 10% is and 1% is , so 6% is and .
Why the other options are wrong
- A. This reads the percentage as degrees; a percent must be multiplied by .
- B. is the bicycle sector in the 2019 pie, where the share was 10%.
- D. This is , the train sector in 2024, the neighbouring row.
What carries over
A share becomes an angle by multiplying by 360, built from 10% = 36°.
Question 3: Share down, number up
Numerical critical reasoning
Use the commuting pie charts from the previous questions.
| Main mode | 2019 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Car | 45% | 36% |
| Bus | 25% | 24% |
| Bicycle | 10% | 16% |
| Train | 15% | 18% |
| Walking | 5% | 6% |
For which mode of transport did the share of commuters fall while the number of commuters rose?
- A.Car
- B.Bus
- C.Train
- D.Walking
Show the answer
Answer: B. Bus
Working
Only car and bus have falling shares. Car: 900 in both years. Bus: in 2019 and in 2024, a rise. So bus is the mode whose share fell and whose number rose.
Why the other options are wrong
- A. The car share fell, but the number stayed at 900; it did not rise.
- C. The train share rose, from 15% to 18%, so it fails the first condition.
- D. The walking share rose, from 5% to 6%; its number rose too, from 100 to 150.
What carries over
Share and amount can move in opposite directions when the whole changes; check each with its own calculation.
Key points
Amount = share × total; a pie alone never gives the total.
Angle = share × 360°, with 10% = 36° as the anchor.
Across two pies, compare amounts only after multiplying by each total.
A share of a share is a product, and belongs to the larger whole.
All questions here are original and written for UniExamer; none comes from the test maker.
Written by the UniExamer team with AI assistance. Every worked example and check question was re-solved by an independent checker before publication. No subject expert has reviewed this lesson yet. If you find a mistake, write to support@uniexamer.com.