Lesson 28 of 36 · Quantitative reasoning

Quadratic equations and inequalities

Factorise quadratics by hand, use the formula and the discriminant when factoring fails, and solve linear and quadratic inequalities safely.

About 22 minutes

In this lesson

  • Solve a quadratic equation by factorising, and by the formula when factorising fails.
  • Solve a linear inequality, reversing the sign when multiplying or dividing by a negative.
  • Solve a quadratic inequality from its roots and the shape of its graph.

The idea

Factorising: the fastest route

A quadratic equation ax2+bx+c=0ax^2 + bx + c = 0 is easiest when it factorises, because a product is zero only when one of its factors is zero. For x2+bx+cx^2 + bx + c, look for two numbers that multiply to cc and add to bb. For x2−5x−14x^2 - 5x - 14: the pair −7-7 and 22 multiplies to −14-14 and adds to −5-5, so

x2−5x−14=(x−7)(x+2)=0⟹x=7 or x=−2.x^2 - 5x - 14 = (x - 7)(x + 2) = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x = 7 \text{ or } x = -2.

Check one root: 49−35−14=049 - 35 - 14 = 0.

When the leading coefficient is not 1, try factor pairs of the first and last coefficients and check the middle term: 2x2−7x+3=(2x−1)(x−3)2x^2 - 7x + 3 = (2x - 1)(x - 3), since 2x×(−3)+(−1)×x=−7x2x \times (-3) + (-1) \times x = -7x.

Two patterns are worth recognising on sight:

a2−b2=(a−b)(a+b),a2±2ab+b2=(a±b)2.a^2 - b^2 = (a - b)(a + b), \qquad a^2 \pm 2ab + b^2 = (a \pm b)^2.

They also help with arithmetic: 49×51=(50−1)(50+1)=2500−1=249949 \times 51 = (50 - 1)(50 + 1) = 2500 - 1 = 2499.

The formula and the discriminant

If no factor pair works, use

x=−b±b2−4ac2a.x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}.

The discriminant D=b2−4acD = b^2 - 4ac tells you how many real roots there are before you finish: two if D>0D > 0, one (a repeated root) if D=0D = 0, none if D<0D < 0. A question that only asks "how many solutions" needs only DD.

Two more facts save time. The roots of ax2+bx+c=0ax^2 + bx + c = 0 add to −ba-\frac{b}{a} and multiply to ca\frac{c}{a}. And never divide both sides by xx: from x2=6xx^2 = 6x, write x2−6x=0x^2 - 6x = 0, so x(x−6)=0x(x - 6) = 0, giving x=0x = 0 or x=6x = 6. Dividing by xx silently throws away x=0x = 0.

Linear inequalities

Solve a linear inequality like an equation, with one extra rule: multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative number reverses the sign. The reason is that negating swaps the order of numbers: 2<52 < 5, but −2>−5-2 > -5.

7−3x>19  ⟹  −3x>12  ⟹  x<−4.7 - 3x > 19 \;\Longrightarrow\; -3x > 12 \;\Longrightarrow\; x < -4.

Test a value: x=−5x = -5 gives 7+15=22>197 + 15 = 22 > 19, which fits, while x=0x = 0 gives 7>197 > 19, which does not. Adding or subtracting never reverses the sign; only multiplying or dividing by a negative does.

When two conditions must hold together, solve each and keep the overlap. If an inequality is strict (<< or >>), the boundary value itself is excluded; check endpoints whenever a question counts integers.

Quadratic inequalities

To solve x2−2x−15≤0x^2 - 2x - 15 \le 0:

  1. Find the roots of the matching equation: (x−5)(x+3)=0(x - 5)(x + 3) = 0, so x=−3x = -3 and x=5x = 5.
  2. Picture the graph. With a positive x2x^2 coefficient, the parabola opens upwards: it is below zero between the roots and above zero outside them.
  3. Read off the answer: ≤0\le 0 means between, so −3≤x≤5-3 \le x \le 5.
Form (leading coefficient positive, roots r1<r2r_1 < r_2) Solution
(x−r1)(x−r2)<0(x - r_1)(x - r_2) < 0 r1<x<r2r_1 < x < r_2
(x−r1)(x−r2)>0(x - r_1)(x - r_2) > 0 x<r1x < r_1 or x>r2x > r_2

Test one value to confirm: x=0x = 0 gives −15≤0-15 \le 0, true, and 0 is between the roots. If the leading coefficient is negative, multiply the whole inequality by −1-1 first, reversing the sign.

Squares and square roots

x2=9x^2 = 9 has two solutions, x=3x = 3 and x=−3x = -3, and x2<9x^2 < 9 means −3<x<3-3 < x < 3, not just x<3x < 3. A square is never negative, so x2≥0x^2 \ge 0 for every xx and an equation like x2=−4x^2 = -4 has no real solution.

Worked examples

Example 1: A quadratic that factorises

Solve x2−5x−14=0x^2 - 5x - 14 = 0.

  1. Look for two numbers with product −14-14 and sum −5-5: these are −7-7 and 22.

  2. Factorise: (x−7)(x+2)=0(x - 7)(x + 2) = 0.

  3. A product is zero only when a factor is zero: x=7x = 7 or x=−2x = -2.

  4. Check both: 49−35−14=049 - 35 - 14 = 0 and 4+10−14=04 + 10 - 14 = 0. The sum of the roots is 5, which matches −ba=5-\frac{b}{a} = 5.

Answer

x=7x = 7 or x=−2x = -2. Writing (x+7)(x−2)(x + 7)(x - 2) gives the right product but the wrong sum (+5+5), so the signs of both roots come out reversed.

Example 2: Counting integers in a quadratic inequality

How many integers xx satisfy x2−2x−15≤0x^2 - 2x - 15 \le 0?

  1. Roots of x2−2x−15=0x^2 - 2x - 15 = 0: factorise as (x−5)(x+3)(x - 5)(x + 3), so x=−3x = -3 and x=5x = 5.

  2. The parabola opens upwards, so it is at or below zero between the roots: −3≤x≤5-3 \le x \le 5.

  3. The sign ≤\le includes the endpoints. Count the integers from −3-3 to 55: 5−(−3)+1=95 - (-3) + 1 = 9.

  4. Check the edges: x=5x = 5 gives 25−10−15=025 - 10 - 15 = 0, allowed; x=6x = 6 gives 36−12−15=9>036 - 12 - 15 = 9 > 0, not allowed.

Answer

9 integers. Subtracting the endpoints, 5−(−3)=85 - (-3) = 8, forgets that both endpoints count.

Example 3: Dividing by a negative

Solve 7−3x>197 - 3x > 19.

  1. Subtract 7 from both sides: −3x>12-3x > 12. Subtracting does not change the sign.

  2. Divide by −3-3, which reverses the sign: x<−4x < -4.

  3. Test: x=−5x = -5 gives 22>1922 > 19, true; x=−4x = -4 gives 19>1919 > 19, false, as the strict sign requires.

Answer

x<−4x < -4. Keeping the sign as it was gives x>−4x > -4, which includes x=0x = 0, a value that plainly fails.

Common traps

  • Forgetting to reverse the sign

    Dividing or multiplying an inequality by a negative number reverses it. After solving, test one value from your answer in the original inequality; it takes seconds and catches the slip every time.

  • Dividing by the unknown

    From x2=6xx^2 = 6x, dividing by xx leaves only x=6x = 6 and loses x=0x = 0. Move everything to one side and factorise instead. In an inequality, dividing by xx is worse still, because you do not know whether xx is negative.

  • Between or outside?

    For an upward parabola, "less than zero" is between the roots and "greater than zero" is outside them. Reversing these is easy under time pressure; a single test value such as x=0x = 0 settles it.

  • Strict signs and endpoints

    << excludes the boundary and ≤\le includes it. When a question counts integers, check each endpoint in the original inequality before including it.

Check yourself

Answer each question before you open its answer.

Question 1: Roots of a quadratic

Quantitative reasoning: quadratics

What are the solutions of 2x2−7x+3=02x^2 - 7x + 3 = 0?

  1. A.x=−3x = -3 or x=−12x = -\frac{1}{2}
  2. B.x=12x = \frac{1}{2} or x=3x = 3
  3. C.x=1x = 1 or x=32x = \frac{3}{2}
  4. D.x=3x = 3 only
Show the answer

Answer: B. x=12x = \frac{1}{2} or x=3x = 3

Working

Factorise: 2x2−7x+3=(2x−1)(x−3)2x^2 - 7x + 3 = (2x - 1)(x - 3); the middle term is −6x−x=−7x-6x - x = -7x. So x=12x = \frac{1}{2} or x=3x = 3. Check with the formula: D=49−24=25D = 49 - 24 = 25, so x=7±54x = \frac{7 \pm 5}{4}, giving 3 and 12\frac{1}{2}.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. These are the roots of (2x+1)(x+3)(2x + 1)(x + 3), which has middle term +7x+7x; the signs are reversed.
  • C. These are the roots of (2x−3)(x−1)=2x2−5x+3(2x - 3)(x - 1) = 2x^2 - 5x + 3; the factor pair gives the right first and last terms but the middle term −5x-5x, not −7x-7x.
  • D. Finds one factor, x−3x - 3, but drops the other: 2x−1=02x - 1 = 0 also gives a solution.

What carries over

When factorising, check the middle term, and keep every factor: each one gives a root.

Question 2: Integers in a quadratic inequality

Quantitative reasoning: inequalities

How many integers xx satisfy x2<2x+8x^2 < 2x + 8?

  1. A.3
  2. B.5
  3. C.7
  4. D.Infinitely many
Show the answer

Answer: B. 5

Working

Rearrange: x2−2x−8<0x^2 - 2x - 8 < 0, which factorises as (x−4)(x+2)<0(x - 4)(x + 2) < 0. The upward parabola is negative between its roots: −2<x<4-2 < x < 4. The integers are −1,0,1,2,3-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, five of them. Check: x=3x = 3 gives 9<149 < 14; x=4x = 4 gives 16<1616 < 16, false.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Counts only the positive integers 1, 2 and 3; 0 and −1-1 also satisfy the inequality.
  • C. Includes the roots −2-2 and 44, but the inequality is strict: at those values both sides are equal.
  • D. Takes the region outside the roots; for an upward parabola, "less than zero" is the region between them.

What carries over

Find the roots, decide between or outside from the parabola, and test the endpoints when counting.

Question 3: Two conditions at once

Quantitative reasoning: inequalities

How many positive integers nn satisfy both 3n−7<203n - 7 < 20 and 5−2n<−35 - 2n < -3?

  1. A.3
  2. B.4
  3. C.5
  4. D.8
Show the answer

Answer: B. 4

Working

First: 3n<273n < 27, so n<9n < 9. Second: −2n<−8-2n < -8; dividing by −2-2 reverses the sign, so n>4n > 4. Together 4<n<94 < n < 9: n=5,6,7,8n = 5, 6, 7, 8, four integers. Check n=5n = 5: 8<208 < 20 and −5<−3-5 < -3; check n=9n = 9: 20<2020 < 20 fails.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Does not reverse the sign when dividing −2n<−8-2n < -8 by −2-2, getting n<4n < 4, so it counts 1, 2 and 3.
  • C. Includes n=4n = 4; at n=4n = 4, 5−8=−35 - 8 = -3, which is not less than −3-3.
  • D. Uses only the first condition, n<9n < 9; the second condition rules out 1 to 4.

What carries over

Solve each condition separately, reverse the sign when dividing by a negative, and keep only the overlap.

Key points

  • Factorise x2+bx+cx^2 + bx + c with two numbers that multiply to cc and add to bb.

  • The discriminant b2−4acb^2 - 4ac counts the real roots: positive two, zero one, negative none.

  • Multiplying or dividing an inequality by a negative number reverses it.

  • For an upward parabola, less than zero is between the roots and greater than zero is outside.

  • Never divide by the unknown; move everything to one side and factorise.

All questions here are original and written for UniExamer; none comes from the test maker.

Written by the UniExamer team with AI assistance. Every worked example and check question was re-solved by an independent checker before publication. No subject expert has reviewed this lesson yet. If you find a mistake, write to support@uniexamer.com.

Esercitati su questo argomento

Domande nuove su questa abilità, con spiegazioni svolte. L’esercitazione richiede un Single Exam Pass o Plus.