Lesson 28 of 36 · Quantitative reasoning
Quadratic equations and inequalities
Factorise quadratics by hand, use the formula and the discriminant when factoring fails, and solve linear and quadratic inequalities safely.
About 22 minutes
In this lesson
- Solve a quadratic equation by factorising, and by the formula when factorising fails.
- Solve a linear inequality, reversing the sign when multiplying or dividing by a negative.
- Solve a quadratic inequality from its roots and the shape of its graph.
The idea
Factorising: the fastest route
A quadratic equation is easiest when it factorises, because a product is zero only when one of its factors is zero. For , look for two numbers that multiply to and add to . For : the pair and multiplies to and adds to , so
Check one root: .
When the leading coefficient is not 1, try factor pairs of the first and last coefficients and check the middle term: , since .
Two patterns are worth recognising on sight:
They also help with arithmetic: .
The formula and the discriminant
If no factor pair works, use
The discriminant tells you how many real roots there are before you finish: two if , one (a repeated root) if , none if . A question that only asks "how many solutions" needs only .
Two more facts save time. The roots of add to and multiply to . And never divide both sides by : from , write , so , giving or . Dividing by silently throws away .
Linear inequalities
Solve a linear inequality like an equation, with one extra rule: multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative number reverses the sign. The reason is that negating swaps the order of numbers: , but .
Test a value: gives , which fits, while gives , which does not. Adding or subtracting never reverses the sign; only multiplying or dividing by a negative does.
When two conditions must hold together, solve each and keep the overlap. If an inequality is strict ( or ), the boundary value itself is excluded; check endpoints whenever a question counts integers.
Quadratic inequalities
To solve :
- Find the roots of the matching equation: , so and .
- Picture the graph. With a positive coefficient, the parabola opens upwards: it is below zero between the roots and above zero outside them.
- Read off the answer: means between, so .
| Form (leading coefficient positive, roots ) | Solution |
|---|---|
| or |
Test one value to confirm: gives , true, and 0 is between the roots. If the leading coefficient is negative, multiply the whole inequality by first, reversing the sign.
Squares and square roots
has two solutions, and , and means , not just . A square is never negative, so for every and an equation like has no real solution.
Worked examples
Example 1: A quadratic that factorises
Solve .
Look for two numbers with product and sum : these are and .
Factorise: .
A product is zero only when a factor is zero: or .
Check both: and . The sum of the roots is 5, which matches .
Answer
or . Writing gives the right product but the wrong sum (), so the signs of both roots come out reversed.
Example 2: Counting integers in a quadratic inequality
How many integers satisfy ?
Roots of : factorise as , so and .
The parabola opens upwards, so it is at or below zero between the roots: .
The sign includes the endpoints. Count the integers from to : .
Check the edges: gives , allowed; gives , not allowed.
Answer
9 integers. Subtracting the endpoints, , forgets that both endpoints count.
Example 3: Dividing by a negative
Solve .
Subtract 7 from both sides: . Subtracting does not change the sign.
Divide by , which reverses the sign: .
Test: gives , true; gives , false, as the strict sign requires.
Answer
. Keeping the sign as it was gives , which includes , a value that plainly fails.
Common traps
Forgetting to reverse the sign
Dividing or multiplying an inequality by a negative number reverses it. After solving, test one value from your answer in the original inequality; it takes seconds and catches the slip every time.
Dividing by the unknown
From , dividing by leaves only and loses . Move everything to one side and factorise instead. In an inequality, dividing by is worse still, because you do not know whether is negative.
Between or outside?
For an upward parabola, "less than zero" is between the roots and "greater than zero" is outside them. Reversing these is easy under time pressure; a single test value such as settles it.
Strict signs and endpoints
excludes the boundary and includes it. When a question counts integers, check each endpoint in the original inequality before including it.
Check yourself
Answer each question before you open its answer.
Question 1: Roots of a quadratic
Quantitative reasoning: quadratics
What are the solutions of ?
- A. or
- B. or
- C. or
- D. only
Show the answer
Answer: B. or
Working
Factorise: ; the middle term is . So or . Check with the formula: , so , giving 3 and .
Why the other options are wrong
- A. These are the roots of , which has middle term ; the signs are reversed.
- C. These are the roots of ; the factor pair gives the right first and last terms but the middle term , not .
- D. Finds one factor, , but drops the other: also gives a solution.
What carries over
When factorising, check the middle term, and keep every factor: each one gives a root.
Question 2: Integers in a quadratic inequality
Quantitative reasoning: inequalities
How many integers satisfy ?
- A.3
- B.5
- C.7
- D.Infinitely many
Show the answer
Answer: B. 5
Working
Rearrange: , which factorises as . The upward parabola is negative between its roots: . The integers are , five of them. Check: gives ; gives , false.
Why the other options are wrong
- A. Counts only the positive integers 1, 2 and 3; 0 and also satisfy the inequality.
- C. Includes the roots and , but the inequality is strict: at those values both sides are equal.
- D. Takes the region outside the roots; for an upward parabola, "less than zero" is the region between them.
What carries over
Find the roots, decide between or outside from the parabola, and test the endpoints when counting.
Question 3: Two conditions at once
Quantitative reasoning: inequalities
How many positive integers satisfy both and ?
- A.3
- B.4
- C.5
- D.8
Show the answer
Answer: B. 4
Working
First: , so . Second: ; dividing by reverses the sign, so . Together : , four integers. Check : and ; check : fails.
Why the other options are wrong
- A. Does not reverse the sign when dividing by , getting , so it counts 1, 2 and 3.
- C. Includes ; at , , which is not less than .
- D. Uses only the first condition, ; the second condition rules out 1 to 4.
What carries over
Solve each condition separately, reverse the sign when dividing by a negative, and keep only the overlap.
Key points
Factorise with two numbers that multiply to and add to .
The discriminant counts the real roots: positive two, zero one, negative none.
Multiplying or dividing an inequality by a negative number reverses it.
For an upward parabola, less than zero is between the roots and greater than zero is outside.
Never divide by the unknown; move everything to one side and factorise.
All questions here are original and written for UniExamer; none comes from the test maker.
Written by the UniExamer team with AI assistance. Every worked example and check question was re-solved by an independent checker before publication. No subject expert has reviewed this lesson yet. If you find a mistake, write to support@uniexamer.com.